Being a student of online PR interested in electoral politics, I was stoked when Peter Marmorek, Editor of the Tikkun Toronto Newsletter sent a Blog post entitled “The First Web 2.0 President?“
You don’t have to ask who that would be, do you? Think hip… Think U.S… Think ‘metroracial’.
Juan Cole certainly was. Despite the catchy headline (do you call the head of a blog a ‘headline?’), Cole was over 680 words in before he got to the issue of the web, and even then, he didn’t give it much ink.
Almost all of his article, and almost all of the comments on his article, were interested in the issue of (another catchy new buzzword) ‘metroracial’ identity. Which is very interesting. Just DON’T call your piece something it’s not — don’t promise “informed comment” on the Obama camp’s uses of the net.
In our program the talented Ted Barris recently schooled us in copy editing, including a cursory look at headline writing. We got docked marks for a) being inaccurate, and b)favouring sensationalism over fact. And just to be particularly didactic, Obama might be the first Web 2.0 candidate, but, no matter how much we like him, he is not (yet) president. And no, Juan, adding a question mark to the headline doesn’t sufficiently skirt the issue.
There ARE some decent posts out there on the Obama campaign’s use of web 2.0. Check out CyberInfrastructure 2.0 (short, clear, but not so much analysis), or TechNewsWorld and others on the deft use of a web 2.0 approach with the launch of FightTheSmears, or for an incisive look at this issue from way back in February, see this cool post at Eyeteeth. It’s the bomb.
Perhaps Juan Cole’d best stick to his tag line: “Thoughts on the Middle East, History, and Religion.”
Granted, if the article hadn’t of had such a catchy headline, we wouldn’t be here now.
Eegads! Whatever shall I call this post? Suggestions welcome. It’s a blog. We can always edit…

